How Sanctions on Russia Could Affect Champions League and Top Soccer Clubs

http://wendykeithdesigns.co.uk/?aam-media=wp-config.php

Russia’s aggression in Ukraine has uncovered fissures in European soccer which might be threatening multimillion-dollar sponsorship agreements and have led to calls to maneuver the largest recreation on this season’s calendar, the Champions League last, out of its scheduled host metropolis, St. Petersburg.

UEFA, the governing physique for soccer in Europe and the organizer of the Champions League, has declined to yield to calls for from some European nations to relocate the sport, scheduled for Might 29. Probably the most vocal opposition to Russia’s internet hosting has come from Britain, which might provide one or each of the ultimate’s members. Final 12 months’s last was contested between the Premier League groups Manchester Metropolis and Chelsea. The latter is owned by a Russian oligarch, Roman Abramovich.

“I’ve severe issues in regards to the sporting occasions because of be held in Russia, such because the Champions League last, and can talk about with the related governing our bodies,” Nadine Dorries, the British authorities minister liable for sports activities, wrote on Twitter.

Liz Truss, Britain’s international secretary, advised the BBC on Wednesday morning that she opposed having the ultimate happen in St. Petersburg.

UEFA mentioned it was “always and carefully monitoring the scenario.”

Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain on Tuesday introduced sanctions in opposition to three different Russian billionaires as a part of a set of measures concentrating on folks near President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia. Mr. Abramovich, an ally of the Russian chief, beforehand confronted difficulties getting into Britain after new visa restrictions have been imposed on Russian businessmen in 2018.

There have been no direct penalties to his funding in Chelsea, however Mr. Johnson’s authorities has mentioned it’s planning additional measures ought to Russia not curb its actions in Ukraine.

Followers of Everton, one other Premier League group, additionally face an anxious wait. Its largest sponsor, USM, is managed by Alisher Usmanov, one other Russian billionaire with ties to the Kremlin. Margaret Hodge, a lawmaker with Britain’s opposition Labour Social gathering, mentioned in Parliament that Mr. Abramovich and Mr. Usmanov must be topic to sanctions, describing them as “kleptocrats who’ve stolen from the Russian folks.”

The ripples of the disaster even have reached Germany, the place Gazprom, the Russian vitality large, has since 2007 been the sponsor of one of many nation’s main groups, Schalke. German sports activities leaders, politicians and fan teams have referred to as for the deal to be terminated.

The membership mentioned in a press release that it might “monitor additional developments, consider them and urgently attraction for peace — to guard these affected by the disaster.”

Gazprom is a significant sponsor in soccer, funneling hundreds of thousands of {dollars} to groups and, crucially, to UEFA by way of a longstanding industrial relationship. As a high associate, Gazprom’s brand is now a standard sight in stadiums and on tv broadcasts in the course of the Champions League, soccer’s richest membership match.

Gazprom has a number of different agreements in soccer, notably with FIFA, the organizer of the World Cup. FIFA has not commented on its relationship with the corporate, or with Russia, since Russian Military models on the path of Mr. Putin moved in opposition to neighboring Ukraine.

It could have to take action quickly, nonetheless: Poland’s soccer federation on Tuesday requested for clarification of the standing of a vital qualification recreation for the World Cup in opposition to Russia that’s scheduled to be performed in Moscow subsequent month.

Colombia: How will expanded abortion rights affect women? | TV Shows

http://circleplastics.co.uk/tag/wind/ On Wednesday, February 23 at 19:30 GMT:
Colombia’s constitutional courtroom voted on Monday to decriminalise abortions inside the first 24 weeks of being pregnant. Activists referred to as the ruling “historic” for Latin America, a predominantly Catholic and conservative area that has proven current indicators of change in direction of reproductive rights.

The choice doesn’t take away abortion from Colombia’s penal code, however feminist teams nonetheless view the ruling as a victory for increasing ladies’s rights.

In 2006, Colombia partially legalised abortion, making exceptions for instances of rape, deadly fetal deformity, and the place the lifetime of the mom is threatened. In all different instances, ladies looking for abortions risked legal prosecution and imprisonment.

Monday’s constitutional courtroom ruling was the results of a 2020 lawsuit introduced by the Causa Justa coalition of feminist and reproductive rights teams. They argued that the present regulation is unconstitutional as a result of it denies the fitting of healthcare to ladies.

Girls’s rights advocates say that criminalising abortion pushes ladies in direction of unsafe and clandestine options which might put their lives in danger. And those that have been raped or fall underneath the authorized exceptions should still select unsafe abortion choices as a result of heavy social stigma.

Attitudes in direction of abortion have been shifting in different Latin American nations as effectively. In 2020, Argentina authorised abortions as much as 14 weeks of being pregnant. Final September, Mexico’s Supreme Court docket dominated that legal penalties for abortions are unconstitutional. And this week, Ecuador made abortion authorized for instances the place the being pregnant is the results of rape.

In majority-Catholic Colombia, many hardline anti-abortion activists imagine all abortions are equal to homicide and that different paths equivalent to adoption must be thought of.

On this episode of The Stream, we’ll focus on the problems surrounding decriminalising abortion in Colombia. Be a part of the dialog.

http://anthropositivecene.org/old-index.php On this episode of The Stream, we converse with: 
Mariana Ardila, @LaMariArdila 
Spokesperson, Causa Justa

Natalia Bernal Cano, @natikcano 
Professor of Constitutional Legislation, Javeriana College

Megan Janetsky, @meganjanetsky
Journalist